Discussion about this post

User's avatar
FreedomFighter's avatar

Japanese are fierce warriors. It is preferable to have them with us then against us.

James Davis's avatar

A little history (historians please correct errors). In the 9/12/25 AT Members Weekly Newsletter J R Dunn’s column is Bogus history; or, Tucker’s war, which is about WWII. In it he debunks the idea that FDR deliberately allowed the Pearl Harbor attack. My own belief is that FDR was applying pressure to Japan by embargoing oil and raw materials to incite military response. Because of the German-Japanese pact, such action would, and did, thwart Hitler’s strategy of carefully maintaining US neutrality. FDR foresaw that a Nazi-fied Europe would be terrible, but he had to contend with a large segment of the US voters who had lived through WWI and wanted no more war. But if Pearl Harbor were known, the battleships wouldn’t have been left as sitting ducks. In WWII the Japanese demonstrated that they had the weapons, manpower and military leadership to be a formidable opponent. But they didn’t have the staying power of the US, whose homeland was never a battle zone. It’s fortunate that their civilian leaders took control away from their military and avoided a scorched-earth close of hostilities. Also fortunate is that MacArthur’s post war Japan, give him credit, whatever the details, cemented US-Japan’s long-standing friendship. Which leads to your treatise, Thomas, and to FF’s comment.

Thomas, I was delighted to see that your column is one of Lucianne’s Saturday, September 20, 2025, Must Reads.

No posts

Ready for more?